Well, okay, true. I'll concede that the intent was valid,
then. I guess it was more the TONE, then... but then again, I've never
seen anything sugar-coated on this list. And it's much, much more
effective when it's not (not to mention amusing).
So, consider my criticism retracted. ;-)
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> By telling people how to be insecure, we would be contributing to the
> increasing attitude of complaceny. If we make it hard to get answers on
> how to be insecure, then people will fight it less and understand it
> more. It's like making stupidity physically painfull. The more it hurts,
> the less people will do it. After all, the more people accept security
> as a way of life, the less inconvient it becomes.
>
> Kenny
>
> PS Like I could resist an open invitation like THAT???
>
>
>
--
Dana S. Tellier Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Engineer University of New Hampshire
InterOperability Lab 7 Leavitt Ln Durham, NH 03824
ATM Consortium 603-862-4626 FAX: 603-862-4181
http://www.distributed.net/ Put wasted CPU cycles to use!
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
