Derek Martin wrote:
>
> I also disapprove... but your
> boss was within his rights. The systems and e-mail sent and received with
> them all belong to your employer. I still don't like it.
That was more or less my viewpoint. In all fairness, he didn't like
having to do it either but had made the decision it was necessary.
> I agree with you to a point, but I think it's important to make sure that
> the person making such a request understands the implications of such
> actions... disabling password security isn't merely not nice, as was the
> case with your experience; it's a REALLY bad idea and could conceivably be
> extremely dangerous, especially given that this is the supreme court of
> the state of Vermont.
True, and again I hope you are just trying to develop an interesting
conversation rather believing I was implying the issue should not have
been brought up. I fully advocate trying to convince Brad to find a way
not to have to do this.
> Would you want YOUR legal records being
> intercepted?
Actually, aren't all records of the supreme courts public? Of course,
IANAL.
--
Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.
But I repeat myself. -Mark Twain
Cole Tuininga
Network Admin
Code Energy, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(603) 766-2208
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
