Do you know if it will be 100% compatible with existing RH installations?
(i.e. no tweaking required to get things working again after an upgrade.
I believe RH could achieve this in a number of ways)
But if not, then let us now have a moment of silence for those of us who
will be broken.........
;-)
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, Cole Tuininga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote:
>
> > > In other news, I'm very psyched that they've switched over to xinetd!
> > > 8)
> >
> > Will you elaborate as to why?
>
> Sure. 8)
>
> First and foremost, to my knowledge it is a lot more security minded.
> The code is audited fairly regularly.
>
> I realize that most of the features it brings (things like limiting
> connections and whatnot per port) can mostly be accomplished through
> tcpwrappers, but I prefer xinetd's syntax.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
