Having spent a few years at Digital.Compaq, where binary compatibility is the way of life, I kind of side with Linus. With open source, a well designed application can be rebuilt in the field even my novices. The lack of binary compatibility does have the affect of making a customer's applications fail when upgrading to a new release. -- Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org ********************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: unsubscribe gnhlug **********************************************************
- Re: Redhat 7.0 (xinetd) Karl J. Runge
- Re: Redhat 7.0 (xinetd) Cole Tuininga
- Re: Redhat 7.0 (xinetd) John Abreau
- Re: Redhat 7.0 (xinetd) Karl J. Runge
- Linux binary compatability (was: Redhat 7.0 (xin... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Linux binary compatability (was: Redhat ... Jeffry Smith
- Re: Linux binary compatability (was: Red... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Linux binary compatability (was... Jeffry Smith
- Re: Linux binary compatability (was... Derek Martin
- Re: Linux binary compatability (was: Redhat ... Tom Rauschenbach
- Re: Linux binary compatability (was: Red... Jerry Feldman
- Re: Linux binary compatability (was... Derek Martin
- Re: Linux binary compatability ... Jerry Feldman
- Re: Linux binary compatabil... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Linux binary compatabil... Jeffry Smith
- Re: Linux binary compatabil... Derek Martin
