Tony Lambiris wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 06:50:14PM -0400, Mjo wrote:
> > We have 2 leads into a few 486 machines, which will help emmensely! YAY!
>
> What do you plan on using these 486 machines for? Only thing I can think of
> that a 486 could handle would be simple NAT, or perhaps a mail server that
> doesnt have a big work load.
Remember, they're setting up a sandbox not a production net, and it's not connected to
the real world. A set of 486s would seem great for toys, could run sniffs and
practice sys admin chores and such easily. I'm not sure they'd be completely useless
for program development, as long as you don't mind taking a break for long compiles
and such. Add one decent server (like my own 486 :-) and you could have a pretty
useful playground, seems to me.
>
> >[...stuff naming KSC sys admin names snipped...]
I agree that sys admins are primarily responsible. So is the management that allowed
them to encounter such problems. BTW, naming names in a public forum seems to me a
bit intrusive, regardless of the merits or responsibility of the individuals named.
--Bruce McCulley
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
