[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Personally, I think a lot of this is moot. Using cleartext FTP for
> authenticated access over the public 'net is a really unnecessary risk these
> days.
Tod said in his original post:
: Without the requirement for windows clients I'd just use scp and
: rsync. Oh, for Windows and Mac rsync clients.
"scp" implies SSH to me...
I know for a fact that there are Windoze SSH clients, and a cursory
look around the net tells me that there are Mac clients as well.
Evidently Tod has researched this and has decided that anything built
on top of SSH won't solve his problem (I can only assume that he
doesn't like the GUIs).
After Tod removed SSH et al. from the list of possible solutions, and
then complained (clumsily, IMHO) about FTP, I expressed my opinion: I
doubted that he'd find another, better, solution.
--kevin
--
Kevin D. Clark (CetaceanNetworks.com!kclark) |
Cetacean Networks, Inc. | Give me a decent UNIX
Portsmouth, N.H. (USA) | and I can move the world
alumni.unh.edu!kdc (PGP Key Available) |
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
