In a message dated: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:25:50 EST
Tom Rauschenbach said:
>I didn't mean stories about "NFS *and* Windows machines" I meant stories
>about NFS and stories about networking with Windows machines. But thanks
>for the tip that SMB is better amongst Linux machines that NFS. It would
>never have occured to me to use SMB in a Linux only LAN.
Noooooooooooooooo!
I'm pretty sure that's not what he meant. Both Ben and I were referring to
the use of SMB as *server* running on a Linux box to server Windows
*clients*.
To share filesystems between Linux systems, use NFS.
Ben, please correct me if I'm mistaken wrt your intentions here.
(and if so, please explain why, in detail, with lots of references as to why
you'd ever use SMB to share fs between 2 Unix/Linux systems :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
"I always explain our company via interpretive dance.
I meet lots of interesting people that way."
Niall Kavanagh, 10 April, 2000
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
