Hi David: > Next week sounds good Will, but we should give folks some warning.
Sorry - yes, the reason I was asking folks for availability was to set up a time that would be good for us. :-) I definitely wouldn't spring it on you like "we're going to meet.....NOW!". :-) I'm still waiting for more availability from a few folks and will set up some proposed times when I hear from them. Thanks! Will David Bolter wrote: > Willie Walker wrote: >> Thanks Francesco! >> >> >>>> In addition, I would also like to raise the idea of making a proposal >>>> to the GNOME release team that a11y become part of the new module >>>> proposal process. I'm curious what people think of that idea and who >>>> would be willing to help test new modules for a11y. >>>> >>> This would presuppose the existance of a clear specifications against >>> which the new modules could be tested. Does it already exist? >>> >> >> Agreed. :-) The testing spec/docs are old and out of date, but we >> have identified this as one of the most important tasks to get done on >> http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/GetInvolved. :-) >> >> BTW, I hope to be able to go through the most important tasks today >> and flesh them out some more. I'd like to give people a clearer idea >> of the problems and the expected deliverables if they were to help us >> out in this space. I'll send out info when I'm done. Then we can all >> meet on IRC sometime next week or possibly even tomorrow. Sound OK? >> > > Next week sounds good Will, but we should give folks some warning. > > D _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
