Hi, With the new bug-buddy, we're all receiving tons of new bugs. It's good, since we now know about some crashers we didn't know before.
However, many of those bugs have invalid stack trace, and have been created by a user who might never go to bugzilla. We're marking those bugs as NEEDINFO, and we now have tons of NEEDINFO bugs. One issue I have with this is that in the past, I used to use NEEDINFO to mark some bugs that were definitely good bugs but which were just lacking an important information. It's not possible to easily find these bugs anymore, since they're lost in the mass of "BADSTACKTRACE" bugs. I'd like us to fix this. I see two possibilities: either introduce a new BADSTACKTRACE status, similar to NEEDINFO but only about incomplete stack traces, or decide that it's okay for us to close the bugs as INCOMPLETE and reopen them if the reporter comes with more details. This second option is probably easier. What do you think? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
