Vincent Untz wrote: >I'd like us to fix this. I see two possibilities: either introduce a new >BADSTACKTRACE status, similar to NEEDINFO but only about incomplete >stack traces, or decide that it's okay for us to close the bugs as >INCOMPLETE and reopen them if the reporter comes with more details. >This second option is probably easier. > >
FWIW, when I did lots of triaging I used to close bad stack traces with INCOMPLETE. A good justification for this is that if you want to help by eg. installing debug packages and resubmitting a trace, the easiest way to do that is to run bug-buddy again and just submit a new bug (and this is what most reporters do anyway). -- Andrew _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
