Andrew Sobala wrote: > Vincent Untz wrote: > >> I'd like us to fix this. I see two possibilities: either introduce a new >> BADSTACKTRACE status, similar to NEEDINFO but only about incomplete >> stack traces, or decide that it's okay for us to close the bugs as >> INCOMPLETE and reopen them if the reporter comes with more details. >> This second option is probably easier. >> >> > > FWIW, when I did lots of triaging I used to close bad stack traces > with INCOMPLETE. A good justification for this is that if you want to > help by eg. installing debug packages and resubmitting a trace, the > easiest way to do that is to run bug-buddy again and just submit a new > bug (and this is what most reporters do anyway). > Oh, it helps if you do this to update the stock response to explicitly tell the reporter what to do. ie. file a new bug.
-- Andrew _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
