Ah ok that makes sense, thank you for clearing that up. I've actually never worked with XML so I wasn't even thinking in the correct terms.
again, thanks. ~Alessandro Ferrucci > What you say is indeed rather meaningless. Virtually every XML > document conforms to some DTD, which lists allowed tags, nesting of > them, etc. DocBook documents are XML files conforming to a DocBook > DTD; this DTD was produced by OASIS. There is also a DTD for SGML, but > it is rarely used nowadays. See > http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/ch01.html > for details. > > On 1/11/06, Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> --- alessandro ferrucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > My understanding was that DocBook was not simply a >> > set of tools but also >> > its own DTD specification with its own elements, >> > separate from XML. >> >> I'm starting to get out of my depth here, so what I >> say next could be total rubbish. :) >> What I have gathered from looking up DocBook specs and >> tutorials is that is *used* to be that, but has since >> been rewritten in terms of XML. >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > gnome-doc-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list > > _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
