https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695225 sysadmin | Mailman | unspecified
--- Comment #10 from Olav Vitters <[email protected]> 2013-03-05 20:59:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > We can document the level of support that it comes with, and in my opinion > System Settings should have at least some level of awareness that it's running > outside of Gnome Shell and that it should hide some entries (isn't the idea > that Gnome may have different shells?) That is not really the idea. Why hide certain settings? > I understand the desire to deprecate legacy code in order to lighten the load > of work on current software going forward, but with this project I expect the > co-operation of Gnome developers where we need to make things work. It would > be > horribly sub-optimal to require a fork of System Settings, for example. > > Also, Vincent's request for someone to take care of the old components have > been very well publicised for months now. If anyone had any objections, they > had ample time to voice it. But nobody took it up until now, and meanwhile various support things have been removed. It would've been nice to hear this a bit earlier. But as said: please announce. And with that: blog post + desktop-devel-list. Otherwise people won't be aware, and you'll run into issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the QA contact of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
