https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695225 sysadmin | Mailman | unspecified
--- Comment #14 from Olav Vitters <[email protected]> 2013-03-06 08:51:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > I would prefer to call it gnome-flashback. We're providing the infrastructure > and the help. We should get the credit as well. Besides, are you planning on > renaming all the binaries and replacing all the gnome-* to something else? I disagree with your argumentation. We have loads of projects at git.gnome.org and Bugzilla. Credit? Who cares. What we support is two things: - GNOME shell - GNOME classic And with support I mean buildbots, release team attention, blocker bugs, ostree, etc. In another tracker bug various fallback mode support code has been removed. So I don't understand how just metacity and gnome-panel would still work without some additional work. But I'm not a developer, so maybe I am missing something. In any case, having such a discussion in this bug is not very helpful. Suggest a desktop-devel-list thread. I can help with the initial email. Jonathan: Please don't be discouraged by the amount of people responding. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the QA contact of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
