https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695225 sysadmin | Mailman | unspecified
--- Comment #15 from Debarshi Ray <[email protected]> 2013-03-06 11:16:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > If you don't want to call it a Gnome project, then you should be less harsh on > people like Ikey who forked it and called it something else (in the case of > Consort/Consortium). Not calling it a GNOME project and forking are completely different things. You can still use the gnome-panel and metacity Git repositories but not prefix the name of the whole desktop environment with GNOME. The names of the binaries and the Git repositories are implementation details which most users won't notice. What they will notice is the name GNOME Xyz, and they will interpret it as an official GNOME project, which it is not. Personally, I always interpreted Vincent's request as an invitation to the MATE developers. I just find it amusing that they decided to fork the whole of GNOME 2.x without talking to anybody, and hence I am curious about the value of yet another DE with GNOME 2.x components when MATE already exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the QA contact of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
