New Issue was created.

Issue 133: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/133
Author:    Abderrahim Kitouni
Assignee:  

Now that flat-manager is working, we would like to use it for nightly apps too. 
Here is a rough plan of the tasks needed to do it. I marked every task with 
whoever I think can do it best, but I can help with everything that doesn't 
require special permissions.

But before, I have a couple of questions:
- Is it okay to use a single repo instead of gnome-nightly/gnome-apps-nightly 
split?
- Is it okay to have a completely new name, say nightly.gnome.org/repo and mark 
older repos as EOL and ask people to migrate?
- Am I correct in thinking that both our arm runners are in fact aarch64, and 
can run both 32bit and 64bit code?

Here is my plan:
- Provide an arm shared runner
  - [ ] tag armv7 (a.k.a 26651128, a.k.a 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/runners/72) to run aarch64 jobs 
as well. (@akitouni)
  - [ ] make packet-1-c1-large-arm (a.k.a. eadc863c, a.k.a. 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/runners/20) a shared runner 
(@barthalion / @jjardon)
- Provide images for building flatpaks in gitlab CI
  - [ ] aarch64 versions of 
[gnome-runtime-images](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-runtime-images) 
(@alatiera / @akitouni)
  - [ ] Decide what to do for arm and i386 (in the same image as 64bit or 
separate images)
- Migrate a test app to flat-manager
  - [ ] maybe epiphany? (@mcatanzaro / @akitouni / @alatiera)
  - [ ] Update CI Templates as needed? (@alatiera / @akitouni)
- Improve the experience downloading from the new server
  - [ ] Enable HTTP/2 (or at least connection keep-alive) on gbm-builder. 
(@barthalion / @averi)
- Announce it publicly
  - [ ] Decide on a final name for the repo
  - [ ] Decide on a deprecation period for the old repos
  - [ ] Announce the migration
  - [ ] Mark the old repos as EOL
- Decomission old stuff (after the deprecation period is over)
  - [ ] Decommission sdkbuilder.g.o (@averi)
  - [ ] make gnome{1,2}.codethink.co.uk gitlab CI runners (@jjardon / 
@barthalion)
  - [ ] drop the old repos from spinner.g.o and add redirects if we decide not 
to break compatibility.


/cc @alexl @aklapper @ebassi @matthiasc @tvb for comments.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/133
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.

_______________________________________________
gnome-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure

Reply via email to