Jordan Petridis commented:

> Is it okay to use a single repo instead of gnome-nightly/gnome-apps-nightly 
> split?

yes, flathub is also a single repo, the gnome-nightly repo is fairly old and at 
the time it might had made sense to have them split, but that's no longer the 
case.

> Is it okay to have a completely new name, say nightly.gnome.org/repo and mark 
> older repos as EOL and ask people to migrate?

I think so, given that we already have 2 repos, it wouldn't be possible to 
migrate all the users anyhow. I think we should deprecate sdk.g.o and remove it 
the next cycle after that. something like nigthly.gnome.org

> Provide images for building flatpaks in gitlab CI

That's easy enough, we could do this we either qemu or aarch gitlab runner

> Decide what to do for arm and i386 (in the same image as 64bit or separate 
> images)

If we keep supporting i386 and arm arches, the 64bit runners would be fine to 
run the jobs. For docker images we most likely want different images cause they 
are quite big, especially if we include debug symbols.

> Migrate a test app to flat-manager

+1 for ephy being the guinea pig, I can take care of the ci config/template. We 
probably though  want ot try this for just x86_64 at first

> Decide on a final name for the repo

Personally I like nightly.g.o since we host stable stuff at flathub. Something 
more flatpak specific might also work.

> Decide on a deprecation period for the old repos

This needs to happen asap, there's also 2 "stable" repos from 2 years ago from 
back when we built the fd.o base there. This should be burned down asap cause 
people still use that instead of flathub.

For the nightlies, I think we could announce the intent and properly depricate 
it later on.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/133#note_508354
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.

_______________________________________________
gnome-infrastructure mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure

Reply via email to