Abderrahim Kitouni commented: > apps should individually setup their CI and use flathub beta channels, I do > not think we should maintain any apps nigthly repo at all. This was done in > the beginning to support flatpak and because there were not a place to put > apps; with flathub this is not a problem anymore Half of this proposal is about nightly apps, if we're going to drop them we can go directly to step 4. That said, flathub beta is not for nightly apps AFAICT. @alexl @barthalion thoughts? I also have in mind a follow up to this to improve the Flatpak DevOps plan, and reduce the load on gitlab by moving things to flat-manager. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/133#note_509900 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
_______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
