Abderrahim Kitouni commented: > We already build the core apps in gnome-build-meta, and buildstream already > supports generating flatpaks. Are there any obstacles to using buildstream > for the flatpaks of the core apps? As it stands now, we build everything assuming a `/usr` prefix, and flatpak apps need an `/app` prefix. So we need to build them twice. Another (small) inconvenience is that the flatpak buildstream plugin is kind of hard to use because one needs to write the metadata file manually. Another option I'm starting to consider is to only build them as flatpaks (and preinstall them as flatpaks in our upcoming OS images). This seems the logical next step to me in the context of https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/issues/142 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/133#note_511479 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
_______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
