--- David Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/14/06, Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Because GUIs are easier to learn and remember. I
> want
> > to focus on the things I am doing, not remembering
> how
> > to apply a patch, how to get a diff out of CVS, or
> how
> > to burn a CD.
>
> Why? Because some times the command line is more
> efficient than any
> current gui. You may argue that if that were the
> case then the gui
> needs work. I would tend to agree but, fixing the
> gui is rarely
> trivial and not always worthy of the time spent.
> Also, GUIs can grow
> to be very large. Sticking with the CD burning
> example, which is
> easier:
>
> 1. Launching Gnomebacker
> 2. Waiting for it to launch
> 3. Dragging the directory/selecting the files
> 4. starting the backup.
> 5. Repeat every time you want to burn a disk (1-4
> or 3-4)
>
> OR
>
> 1. Run Gnome backer once to get the commandline
> that works well
> 2. Create an alias for that command ( burn="mkisofs
> FILENAMES | cdrecord -" )
> 3. run `burn FILENAMES`
> 4. repeat step 3 for every disk you want to burn
Hmm...
1. Open Nautilus burn folder
2. Burn to ISO
3. Right-click on ISO file and choose "Burn to disc"
4. Repeat step 3 as desired.
> In example two I'm assuming that you already have a
> terminal open --
> usually the case on my desktop.
>
> You don't necessarily have to remember some arcane
> command -- thats
> what alias is for.
Except that it took me ages to sort out aliases.
Because of some reason I don't understand, there is
bashrc AND bashprofile, and the docs tell you to add
aliases to one while the system reads another --
something to do with one not being an 'interactive
shell', whatever that is. When I tried to file that as
a bug it boomeranged back with the usual 'you're not
l33t enough to understand this' subtext.
We have an awful lot of legacy inconsistencies
floating around in command line space.
> If I don't make any points with that, let me throw
> out another reason.
> Now and then a fellow wants a task automated that
> doesn't need any
> user interaction ( or minimal interaction ). When
> that is the case,
> one needs to know how to write a script. (I hope
> you aren't going to
> try to argue that scripts are unnecessary also.)
No, they're not unnecessary.
But have you seen Apple's Automator? ;)
> Many of linux users (I would wager 90% of linux
> users until recent
> years) use linux because of the command line (among
> other reasons).
And that is one of our major problems. We're not on
the same level as the users we are hoping to reach
with GNOME.
> It is definately not for everyone, but we need some
> users that
> understand the system intamately so that the great
> programs like gnome
> can continue to get developed. The users who
> already know the
> information won't be with us for ever and should try
> to recruit new
> ones when we can. I think making the commands
> available is a great
> way to do that.
Yes, that is an excellent point.
I do think this is a valid idea, and yes, if it were
to be developed I would check it out.
I am just wary of the 'command line is the ultimate'
mindset, and I tend to play devil's advocate against
it :)
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
gnome-love mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love
