Hi All, Just a note about GTK+ Transparency. GTK Transparency is very nice, but in Gnome3 I think blur-effect on transparency should be implemented, otherwise text will be unreadable on transparent panels.
Peter Op zondag 17-01-2010 om 19:44 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Joern Konopka: > > > 2010/1/17 Shane Fagan <[email protected]> > > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 18:18 +0000, Samuel Arthur Wright > Illingworth > wrote: > > > 2010/1/17 Joern Konopka <[email protected]> > > Hi All, i hope i did everthing right considered this > is my > > first Mailing List Answer EVER, but i just wanted to > lose some > > words about the Live Wallpapers. > > > > > > Im not gonna delve into the discussion about > Nautilus drawing > > the Icons since its quite a Topic for itself. > > > > > > I think implementing Live Wallpapers at this point > of > > gnome-shell development is just too much to ask for > honestly, > > it might look nice at first sight but we really > should focus > > on more important stuff right now like f.e. getting > an > > Extension System rolled out, have some Customization > Options > > integrated into the Shell for switching the Black > Look to > > something more personalized (some people love a pink > or blue > > background, simple as that), make the new Notifier > System > > really usable (in a PRODUCTIVE way), have good > Zeitgeist > > Integration thats really giving User advantages > while browsing > > Recent Files, have more Keyboard Actions for the > Shell so > > people wont have to click on pretty much everything > and so on > > and so on, i could point out a list of maybe 50 > features and > > the Live Wallpapers would be way below that list. > > > > > > Im not saying it totally sucks, maybe some people > will > > actually like it, but we should focus on giving > everybody a > > good Working Experience for the Everday Tasks before > we start > > thinking about Features that exist mainly for > Eyecandy. > > > > > > > > I wish I didn't, but I agree with that. Gnome-Shell (and > Gnome 3 in > > general) should be functional before it's pretty. > > > > > > The problem with that, if Gnome 2 is anything to go by, is > the > > developer attention may never go to making it all look > > sexy, especially not in terms of additional features rather > than just > > changing the colours. For example, we still don't have > global support > > for transparency in GTK. > > > > -- > > Sam Illingworth > > Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom > > Canonical is bringing transparency in GTK for ubuntu lucid and > they are > pushing the code upstream so its coming. > > Shane > > > > A link concerning the Transparency in GTK for anybody whos wondering > what it might look like or doesnt have a clue what were talking about: > > > http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-aero-style-rgba.html > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
