>>> >>> Unfortunately, there isn't a better way to determine this sort of >>> thing other than trying all extensions one by one and seeing which >>> ones leak vs. don't leak. >>> >> >> That is unfortunate, indeed, ..really not possible? >> >> As I said, I am a user, not a developer. >> >> I will gladly run gnome shell in debug mode and watch memory consumption >> of extensions, individual threads, or whatever way there is to >> differetiate between shell and extensions, if this is at all possible? > > There is no differentiation at runtime. Any extension can do whatever > it wants to the Shell. > >> But, I cannot spend weeks disabling and re-enabling individual >> extensions and see what memory usage comes up with. I am not in a >> testlab, I am using my computer for work. > > If you have five extensions or so, it shouldn't take too long. >
Well, I have 15. Giving that I need 48 hrs continous operation for reliable results, that will make it 30 days. no that is not long for a user needing actually to do other stuff.. And if the next thing you tell me is not to use so many extensions, I will gladly switch to KDE or even better re-install Windows. Please, you are not helping, instead, you are asking me to do some time-consuming thing that I am not even an expert in, although I was the one offering to help out, that is counter-productive.. Regards, Sven _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
