Doesn't it more depend on the distribution one uses? I mean, when gnome is
released it takes a while for Debian to put it in the stable release. And even
when using the unstable release, it will take some time. And when finally all
packages are there, I personally never had problems. That being said, if
someone uses distributions like Arch, then I think it is not much work to use
extensions as fresh as they are directly from the developers repository.
extensions.gnome.org is in my respect similar to the stable release from Gnome.
It takes time to make sure everything has been reviewed.
Cheers,
Marcel
On 9/10/19 9:50 PM, Jason DeRose wrote:
As an extension developer, I don't think it's necessarily fair to burden the
GNOME team with building a wrapper API and maintaining backwards compatibility
forever. Even if this did come to fruition, it would likely end up too narrow
in scope to give extensions the flexibility they enjoy now by being able to
override basically any behavior in the shell.
That said, it is extremely frustrating that there is no possible way to fix and
release an extension on extensions.gnome.org before a new GNOME release occurs.
Breaking changes are made literally up until the Release Candidate is
generated, and the extension review queue may sit untouched for months (which
is a major problem itself). A week or two should be built into the timeline for
extension developers to release an updated version to e.g.o., and then the
extension review queue should be cleared before the new version is released.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019, at 3:23 PM, Leslie S Satenstein via gnome-shell-list
wrote:
Sadly, from one Gnome version or subversion to another, with each change, the majority of
extensions are broken, and *"Florian Müllner", *that includes the ones you
wrote. Many people are abandoning Gnome, simply because their favorite extensions no
longer work.
I have a deep appreciation of the application development process and the QA
that is needed. May I propose or suggest that there be an a new standardized
interface for gnome extensions, an extension api, which will be responsible
backend for the interfacing to the various gnome versions? This api to be
providing a consistent interface for extension developers. My two favourite
broken extensions are your menu extension and the Taskbar extension which works
partially with Tumbleweed, fully with Centos, and not at all with recent
Fedora's version 30 or any Linux Distribution using a Gnome version beyond 3.32.
Regards
*
Leslie*
*Leslie Satenstein***
*Montréal Québec, Canada*
****
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
