Derek Smithies a écrit : > Of course, if you take the approach of doing both (gtk and gnome with a > configure switch), you end up writing two applications. A gtk frontend for > opal, and a gnome front end for opal.
You seem to believe that there's nothing in common between a gnome and a gtk+ application. This is a very wrong assumption : gtk+ is the toolkit in both cases ; being gnome just means : (a) using some more convenience libraries (b) following some guidelines For (a), you have to know about the Ridley project, which intends to push some things from gnome libraries into gtk+ itself (GtkAssistant and GtkStatusIcon come to mind), which means gnome applications will have even more in common with gtk+ applications ! For (b), notice that following the guidelines doesn't force us to have gnome dependancies! All in all, as I already explained, we already have both Damien's choices (1) and (2), and we already paid the cost of migrating from a pure gnome to a more generic application. Things look brighter in my eye :-) Snark _______________________________________________ GnomeMeeting-list mailing list GnomeMeeting-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
