Am Sat, 5 Aug 2017 21:14:04 +0300
schrieb Jean Louis <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > To be honest, I found the whole procedure of becoming an endorsed
> > distro non-transparent.
> I have read these pages here:
> and there is email on how to contact FSF, and FSF
> is responsive, so I see that whole procedure is
> very transparent.
Yes, it is clear how to contact: "please write to <webmast...@gnu.org>"
However, it is not very clear what happens next. How the distro is
reviewed, what steps are involved.
The page states: "When you do, we'll explain more about our evaluation
process to you, and get started on it quickly."
Well, they didn't when I contacted them some years ago.
And why explain it only privately, why not public for
anyone to see? That is what I call non-transparent.