On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:07:03 +0200 Ricardo wrote: > This is certainly a more convenient position to take when the > alternative is to acknowledge defects in (or lack of) a > consensus-finding process — not just in how free distributions cooperate > (or rather *don’t*), but in any top-down decision. Unfortunately, this > is a common pattern in GNU and the wider community of free > distributions.
im not sure what was the context of that; but i think i agree fully with that statement when i wrote that the FSF should be the leadership, that is mainly because distros can not agree on some of the most essential things like "is foo libre or not?"; and we are currently not allowed to do so by consensus it would be ideal to form a consensus perhaps with "guidance" from the top; as long as the community would be mature enough to accept the consensus, _whatever_ that is, and work to change the opinions of those in disagreement
