David Kastrup wrote: [...] > As you can see, you are wrong. Again. Too bad. The meaning of > "license" you refer to above does not exhaust the legal meanings of > that term. Those are meanings 1&2, but meaning 3&4 are also valid > uses.
Legal dictionaries are not legal authorities to begin with. And it doesn't say that #4 is not a contract (conveying a grant) subject to condition and covenants. So how am I wrong, dak? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
