David Kastrup wrote:
> As you can see, you are wrong.  Again.  Too bad.  The meaning of
> "license" you refer to above does not exhaust the legal meanings of
> that term.  Those are meanings 1&2, but meaning 3&4 are also valid
> uses.

Legal dictionaries are not legal authorities to begin with. And it 
doesn't say that #4 is not a contract (conveying a grant) subject 
to condition and covenants. So how am I wrong, dak?

Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to