Bernd Jendrissek wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Bernd Jendrissek wrote: > >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >You seem to misunderstand. The resulting overall program containing > >> >independent works for all its components is indeed "still just a > >> >compilation". But it now contains a derivative program (among other > >> >computer program works) -- a derivative set of instructions to > >> >eliminate FSF. > >> > >> So all compilations of independent works are also derivative works in > >> their own right? Is that what you are saying? > > > >Not at all. An independently created compilation is never a derivative > >work. > > So really it was just a poor example you made up?
Yet another GNUtian playing idiot. Ok, I'll explain it once again if and when you'll become capable of posting without that PGP junk in your messages. Ok? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
