Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: >> >> > "Although a vertical, maximum-price-fixing agreement is unlawful >> > under 1 of the Sherman Act, it does not cause a competitor >> > antitrust injury unless it results in predatory pricing." -- >> > U.S. Supreme Court >> >> You have yet to show that setting a price at zero is predatory >> pricing. Just selling below cost is not by definition predatory. >> >> He also has to show that the GPL actually sets a fixed price of zero >> (or anything else for that matter) for a work. > > Hey paragon of intellect, please read the GPL 2 b).
That's not "for a work" but for the act of licensing under the GPL. You can charge whatever you want for a work, but the GPL license (and the source code) must not cost extra. You really should be more careful with dishing out insults. It makes yourself look even more ridiculous. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
