On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 17:10 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > Time to address this little bit of silly propaganda.
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > > > One of Lex Terekhov's favorite "heroes" looses his "cause": > > > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060320201540127 > > > > Mr. Wallace's fourth Amended Complaint was dismissed and the > > Free Software Foundation's Motion to Dismiss was granted. It's > > the Order that tells Wallace to pay the Free Software > > Foundation's costs. Judges do that when they'd like you to learn > > a good lesson. It's a signal you shouldn't have brought the case > > in the first place. > > That seems to be at odds with what it says in FRCivP 54(d): > > "... costs other than attorneys' fees shall be allowed as of course > to the prevailing party ..." > > Interestingly enough, the FSF has not filed a bill of costs. And it > appears that the 14-day deadline for doing so has expired. > > "... Failure to file such bill or motion or to obtain leave of Court > for extensions of time within which to file shall be deemed a waiver > of the right to recover taxable costs or attorney fees." The FSF doesn't seek every penny out of a lunatic... The horror... the horror... News at 11pm Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
