On 2006-05-16, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Merijn de Weerd wrote: >> was just saying that that should change: also in-house code >> should be shared, once it's out of testing. > > That would be at odds with copyright law (which the GPL blatantly > misstates by saying that "nothing else grants you permission to > modify or distribute"), dear law student.
Don't patronize, dear Alex. As I said to David, I was talking about code that offers a service to the public. In other words, a public performance of the work. By the way, do you have some sort of compulsion to add a random quote from 17 USC to anything you post? Merijn -- Remove +nospam to reply _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
