David Kastrup wrote: [...] > Stallman's work, later enhanced by other parties but kept (c) FSF all > the time.
(C) FSF doesn't mean that the code was written by the FSF, retard. Folks assign their 100% original code to the FSF on regular basis. Then comes FSF's crackpot derivation theory (e.g. gpl-faq.html#OOPLang) and humble suggestions along the lines of http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/assignunisrule.html ----- Once code is written and placed under the GPL, any code based on that code and distributed will also placed under the GPL. Thus, there is nothing a university could do with a developer's code if it is based on previously GPL'd code anyway. There is no good reason NOT to assign code to the FSF. ----- http://www.google.com/search?q=jacobson+FSF yields "From: "Jonas Jacobson via RT" <copyright-clerk at fsf dot org>" and "FSF Assignment Administrator Jonas Jacobson". Man oh man. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
