David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > [...] > >> In this case, the FSF is the legally-recognised author and the > >> exclusive licensor. They hold the copyright. > > > > AFAIK, the FSF isn't exclusive licensor of assigned stuff. > > They grant you a sublicense for arbitrary use under any license you > choose.
Read again the quoted snipped from the IBM assignment letter, retard. Was it really that special? How about this part: "The Foundation agrees that all of its distributions of the Transferred Work, or of any work "based on the Transferred Work" (that is any work that in whole or in part incorporates or is derived from all or part of the Transferred Work), shall be under a version of the Foundation's General Public License, Lesser General Public License or Library General Public License (collectively "LGPL")." regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
