David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > [...] > >> benefitting the general public > > > > Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment > > regarding the "public"? > > Just a rant, and obviously so.
http://floatingpoint.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/off-the-record/#comments ------ Dan Lyons // Oct 17th 2006 at 7:52 am Translation: Nothing to worry about here, folks. Just move along, thats it, dont look over there, look over here, pay no attention to that GPLv3, theres nothing important in there, nothing to worry about, its all being done out in the open, its all very reasonable and above-board, with no hidden agendas, no radicals running the show, everythings fine, and whatever else you hear, why thats just FUD spread by the enemies of freedom. Free as in freedom, dude! Thats what were about. Freedom, remember? Just keep repeating it. Free, free, free. See? You feel better already. ------- > The FSF does not even "control" ... http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt "the intent is to ... control the distribution of derivative or collective works based on the Program." eh? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
