Qui, 2006-10-19 às 14:31 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > > The FSF does not even "control" ... > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt > > "the intent is to ... control the distribution of derivative or > collective works based on the Program." > > eh?
How very manipulative of you. A pity you intentionally try to mean that the FSF is in control of something when in reality... ... the intent [OF THE LICENSOR] is to ... control the distribution of derivative works based on the Program [HE WROTE]. If I license some software under the GNU GPL _I_ want to control the distribution of derivative works based on the Program _I_ WROTE in order to assure every user of what _I_ WROTE get's the same freedoms, and never a subset of them. If _I_ intended otherwise, _I_'m perfectly free to choose some other license, or even to write my own license. Reality check: the FSF can only maintain the Freedom of software that has copyrights assigned to the FSF. Of course there are trolls like Lyons and Therekov, that try to fool everyone, but are so troll-like that only through shady stuff can they spell their mischief, for should the sun shine over them, quite clearly they would be revealed to be as harmless as stone statues. Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
