David Kastrup wrote: [...] > intended by the licensor: yes, the copyright holder has the "control"
There are limitations, such as free (of copyright control) distribution of copies lawfully made and free (of copyright control) modification, copying, and distribution of those additional exact copies made from originals under 17 USC 117. The FSF's intent is clearly at odds with copyright (misuse trying extract rights to independent non-derivative works and killing economic incentive to create derivatives with subsequent IPR selling above cost of creation aside for a moment). [...] > you conveniently snipped again) the FSF has not been able to even > contain forks of Emacs and gcc. The forks remain under the GPL, moron. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
