Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "They're not distributing Linux," Wilder said. "They're providing > somebody access to a service but they're not providing copies of Linux > on a disk, and they're not providing somebody access to Linux for the > purpose of download, and so they're not engaged in any distribution."
It's always nice to see MS arguing for copyright to be interpretted narrowly. -- Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3 http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ GPLv3 and other work supported by http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
