David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> >>
> >> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Given that MS vouchers don't contain any code whatsoever, what does
> >> > it have to do with copyright to begin with?
> >>
> >> Copyright law prohibits a lot more than copying.
> >
> > It's always funny to see GNUtians ("free as in freedom") arguing
> > for copyright to be interpreted open end, so to speak.
>
> It _is_ more or less being interpreted open end. For some of their
> interpretations, the FSF would certainly not mind being shown wrong in
> court.
http://weblog.ipcentral.info/archives/2007/05/print/004561.html
--
"I am on leave from Columbia Law School for the academic year
2006-07. I can be contacted most easily through the Software
Freedom Law Center. I will be holding sporadic office hours, for
students only, at Columbia beginning September 15, 2006."
-- Eben "Anarchism Triumphant"/"dot Communist Manifesto"/"Gates
sufferes from autism"
http://dartreview.com/archives/2005/04/08/intellectual_property_is_so_last_year.php
Moglen
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
