Ciaran O'Riordan wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "They're not distributing Linux," Wilder said. "They're providing > > somebody access to a service but they're not providing copies of Linux > > on a disk, and they're not providing somebody access to Linux for the > > purpose of download, and so they're not engaged in any distribution." > > It's always nice to see MS arguing for copyright to be interpretted > narrowly.
Given that MS vouchers don't contain any code whatsoever, what does it have to do with copyright to begin with? Suppose that I'll offer you a voucher for Microsoft Windows that you can redeem in a shop of a friend of mine. Do you really expect me to go to Microsoft and ask for permission (take a license) to hand you such voucher? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
