Quoth mike3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Oct 10, 5:49 pm, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> mike3 writes: >> > Would it be possible to construct a Free (note the capital "F") operating >> > system that would be capable of meeting all the UNIX standards (POSIX, >> > SUS, etc.) precisely enough to be able to be certified by The Open Group >> > as UNIX(R)... >> >> Any major Linux distribution could qualify, but nobody cares any more. >> > > You sure? I thought they would require modification. But I'm not > sure just how extensive it would need to be. If it is not be a huge > amount, perhaps, just perhaps, one might "drift" over the "sweet > spot" but of course nothing would really happen since the creators > would either a) not notice it or b) not have the money to actually > pay The Open Group to certify it. And, UNIX is just a label really, > so even if it is not certified to be legally branded as such that > does not necessarily make it any worse in terms of quality, > capability, etc., especially if it were to otherwise meet all the > relevant standards.
The *biggest* part would be the cost of having "whatever remains of The Open Group" evaluate the system to validate that it conformed to their requirements. The biggest *change,* as far as I was last aware, that would be needed would be to introduce the STREAMS abstraction, which both BSD and Linux folk have generally eshewed. Back before they had become SCO and became "evil," I believe Caldera had built a version of STREAMS for Linux, but were rebuffed on introducing it into "official" kernels as people generally thought it was a bad idea. (STREAMS *was* controversial; a lot of people really didn't like it, so this wasn't anything personal against Caldera.) > BTW, what do you think of the conception that if it's "Unix", it's a > "powerful" OS? I think that in a very important sense, it no longer matters, at least in terms of looking at "UNIX(tm)." There are so many implementations that are definitely *NOT* "UNIX(tm)" (though they are certainly 'Unix', with lower case letters) that are reasonably powerful that the trademark isn't worth that much anymore. Consider Linux, the prolific sets of BSD 4.3 branches, MacOS-X, possibly even Hurd... There are also a number of RTOSes that provide POSIXy functionality, and probably a bunch of other kernels that I'm forgetting. -- (format nil "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "cbbrowne" "gmail.com") http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lsf.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #153. "My Legions of Terror will be an equal-opportunity employer. Conversely, when it is prophesied that no man can defeat me, I will keep in mind the increasing number of non-traditional gender roles." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/> _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
