mike3 writes: > For _some_ practical purposes, maybe. But I don't think I'm the only one > that would have problems if I wrote something in terms of a standard and > then tried to run it on something that didn't quite comply with that > standard.
I hope you are not assuming that the fact that a system is "certified" as complying with a standard guarantees that it actually does comply. > Oh, don't give me that advocacy crap. ISTR that TOG was considering > waiving the license fee for Linux if it could meet the compliance test, > but it still hasn't happened. Maybe the Linux groupies have too big > egos? Or maybe no one who matters gives a damn? If you want Linux certified than shut up and get out there and get it done. You have everything you need. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
