Hyman Rosen wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > On one hand you seem to believe that "industry generally acts as if the > > GPL works as intended" and on the other hand you keep bringing up the > > GPL "enforcement" cases that just show that a lot of companies utterly > > ignore the GPL. > > The recording industry generally acts as if copyright on songs > works as intended. There are nevertheless many cases where > copyrights are being ignored, and then the industry brings > enforcement actions against those people.
Are those works available to the general public to copy and do all other acts reserved to the copyright holders like in the case of the GPL licensed works? Show me a single RIAA copyright case "against those people" where RIAA attached a copyright license (with whatever terms) to the complaint. You are either very confused or dishonest, Hyman. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
