Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Would you agree that violation of rules imposed by public law institutions (statutory) can NOT be equated to violation of "rules" promulgated by "private agreement" intended to "substantially oust public law institutions", Hyman?
Beats me. I'm just a simple caveman. I think he's trying to say the same thing that the GPL preamble says, that they're using the law against itself - that a law designed to prevent sharing is now being used to force sharing. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
