Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > [...] > >> Tell me, have there been any cases where somebody has been sued for > >> infringement of the GPL (whichever version), and the resolution of the > >> legal process has allowed him to continue infringing the GPL? > > > Case number 1:07-cv-11070-LTS. > > > On this page > > > http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp > > > Verizon continues to distribute GPL'd works in binary form utterly > > ignoring the GPL. > > Does it ignore the GPL? I haven't checked.
Why don't you "check it", Alan? > > > The case against Verizon > > > http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf > > That's just the plaintiff's complaint. Yeah, and... ? > > > was dismissed WITH PREJUDICE against plaintiffs. > > Was it? Can you cite the document of dismissal? That would be more > helpful. http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/DISMISSAL.pdf regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
