"Hyman Rosen" <hyro...@mail.com> wrote in message
news:3wenl.22791$ug1.9...@newsfe16.iad...
amicus_curious wrote:
Heck, the source code was made available before the case was filed, even.
But it was made available by someone who was not even sued. How do you
explain such a curious thing?
Once legal action begins, it becomes difficult to ignore
inconvenient requirements and people get prodded into action.
You are saying the SDLC does not bother with the details of their cases?
That seems illogical.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
