"Hyman Rosen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Rjack wrote:
Now, the above is 100% *verifiable*.
It is 100% verifiable that after the case ended, the
source code was made available as required by the GPL.
Heck, the source code was made available before the case was filed, even.
But it was made available by someone who was not even sued. How do you
explain such a curious thing? Hint, you cannot. The SDLC is a bunch of
opportunistic buffoons who prey on the little guy for legal fees. They
dishonor the name of FOSS.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
