Hyman Rosen wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > The Apache License says that any distribution of such "combined" work > > must include a copy the Apache License because it (the Apache License, > > not the GPL) governs employed preexisting material licensed under the > > Apache License. > > Combined works that include GPLed code must be licensed as a whole under > the GPL, and then also under the conditions imposed by the non-GPLed > components.
This is utter legal nonsense, silly. > If all the conditions can be simultaneously satisfied, then > the combined work may be copied and distributed, otherwise it may not. > > > Don't you know that the ASF doesn't agree with the FSF regarding > > purported "incompatibility" to the GPLv2? > > So what? Go to doctor Hyman. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
