Alexander Terekhov wrote:
So a tarball with all the sources is somehow different from compiled and linked binary resulting from the same sources
Of course. The former is a verbatim copy of the source code, readily reconstructed from its transmitted form. The other is not. In any case, the only thing you have argued is that the former may not be a verbatim copy either. It seems unlikely that such a view would prevail, however. > See also Section 3 Of what? The copyright code? The GPL? You cannot expect people to make your arguments for you, because your arguments are invariably incorrect. You need to state your arguments, and then we will point out to you how they are wrong. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
