Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
That leaves the GPL open to the different common law contract
> interpretation rules of the fifty different states (plus Guam
> and Puerto Rico).
This is not a problem because of 17 USC 301.
If it were legally enforceable, which it is not.
The GPL is legal and enforceable (in the sense that if someone
copies and distributes without obeying its conditions he is
liable for copyright infringement).
If it were legally enforceable, which it is not.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
