On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:37:23 -0400, Rjack wrote: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> Rjack wrote: >>> That leaves the GPL open to the different common law contract >> > interpretation rules of the fifty different states (plus Guam and >> > Puerto Rico). >> >> This is not a problem because of 17 USC 301. >> >>> If it were legally enforceable, which it is not. >> >> The GPL is legal and enforceable (in the sense that if someone copies >> and distributes without obeying its conditions he is liable for >> copyright infringement). > > If it were legally enforceable, which it is not.
Why would the GPL be different from any other EULA out there? -Thufir _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss